Monday 24 October 2016

Erin Brockovich Movie Questions & Reflections

Erin Brockovich Movie Questions & Reflections

Personal struggle

1. The struggles that Erin Brockovich had with balancing her family and her job are: focusing on the case of PG&E, being a single mother who had to take of her three children, deal with her boyfriend who she doesn't trust because of the past relationships she had, and trying to earn enough money for a living. 

2. I think a man would not be likely to have the same problems because in the past women were not treated equally as men. So they both had different jobs. A man would have more jobs than a woman because of a stereotype that men are better than women. A woman would be seen weak compared to a man so their reputation would risk their job.

Professionalism

3. Erin Brockovich did not show professionalism in her job only because she cared for the people of Hinkley. During the case of PG&E, Erin was a serious and dedicated woman. She knew that she wasn't professional but only because no one took her seriously.

4. The image she projected was being a hard working woman who never gives up. She was often rude but only because she wanted to show people how confident she was and that she could do more than what people see of her. She cares about her work and others. 

5. As a woman, this image made it difficult for her. Unlike others, she took her job very seriously. Not only that, she has a short temper and got fired because she was focusing on the PG&E case. Ed Masry thought she was skipping work because of her reputation acting like a "girl" even though she was working really on the case.

Social Responsibility

6. The substance that was making people sick was Chromium-6.

7. The substance contaminated the water reserves in PG&E plants that supply all their water to the town of Hinkley.

8. The company that was responsible was PG&E, an investor-owned electric utility. 

9. Erin's motivation for pursuing this issue was to save the family of the Jensens. They were the reason why she found the case and also reminded her how much she loves her own family and will work hard if anything harms them.

10. Symptoms of Chromium-6 can cause asthma, chronic bronchitis, tumors, cancer and much more.

Small Business Owner

11. The risks that Ed Masry took as a small business owner was facing a multi-billionaire company. He took the risk of losing his firm and his job. As a small business owner battling with a company this huge was a large feat for Ed Masry and his team. 

12. Ed Masry took the risk by hiring Erin because he knew she was short tempered but also has a lot more initiative than he has, that could also risk his job. Ed only took pity on Erin because she was only a single mother who has trying to care for her three kids. Her large ambitions differ from Ed's and he usually disagrees with her actions usually because she doesn't know much. But her initiative and care forces Ed to take more risks.


Corporate Decisions


13. PG&E continued to lie to the residents of Hinkley about the water conditions because they didn't want anyone to know that it was their fault. It would destroy their business and their reputation. 


14. PG&E should have at first, try to resolve the problem so that no one would have known about the water conditions or tell everyone in the begin, that their water wasn't safe. Compared to the large lawsuit that they faced at the end, telling the people at the beginning would have saved them a huge amount of money.


15. It is sometimes harder to make the right (ethically correct) decisions than the wrong (unethical) decisions because you don't want to be blamed for your decisions or admit your faults. But this is normal for us, as we try to avoid our own faults. But as always is morally wrong.


16.  In order for governments to prevent companies from making unethical decisions, they should enforce more strict rules, and teach companies the outcome of any unethical decisions, that their company would be totally ruined if something happens to go wrong especially for large companies.


17. The consequence for any unethical decisions or companies should be a penalty to restrict from doing anything else. That will also affect their reputation as a company. The company should be forced to improve their ethically standards so that any unethical decisions are to be avoided.  
  


Personal Reflection/Essential Questions & Connections

18. During an ethically tough decision I look through my options on what I can actually do whether it would benefit me or not. As always I try to find the best decision for me and others. They always have to morally correct to benefit everyone.

19. Suggestions for others who will face tough ethical decisions is to check whether or not you're doing the right thing. Apart from you, others should feel that your decisions are the right thing to do. Whatever you do may affect others too and you need to consider that. As long as it doesn't hurt anyone else but at least hinders you, then you may be on the right track. Always think if it's the right thing to do for others, as you can always help yourself later on.


20. Businesses should demonstrate corporate responsibility because it will improve the work ethics of the company. More ethically decisions will be made and improve the reputation of the company. Better positive working will improve employee working habits and social responsibility in the company.


21. The decisions that you make always impact others because of the effects of your decisions. If you decide to keep a secret from others then it will always negatively affect that person. Even the most simple decisions will affect somebody else.  For example, if you plan to keep someone's pencil from them, then they may end up needing the pencil. It's the ethical decisions that will help you benefit others. Just think whether or not if it's the right thing to do.

Thursday 20 October 2016

Erin Brockovivh Movie Assignment - BBI

Romulo Partoriza                                                                                    October 19, 2016
Erin Brockovich The Movie


In 1993, Erin Brockovich, an unemployed woman was involved in a car accident. This event changed her life forever. The doctor, who was involved in the accident wanted to sue her. Ed Masry, a lawyer representing Erin, lost the case because of her short temper. Realizing how she was unemployed, she tried her best to find a job even though she had limited skills. She finally landed a job at Ed Masry’s private law firm (the lawyer who was representing her for the car crash), who she called multiple times but never answered. Ed took pity on her because she knew she was unemployed, had no special skills and had three children but had the drive to work hard.


Erin’s job was to organize files for the private law firm until Ed decided to give her a real-estate case about Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) who wanted to buy the home of Donna Jensen, who lived in Hinkley, California. Upon reading the file, she was surprised to see medical records in a real-estate case so she decided to meet Donna for more information. It turns out that the family had health problems, and the only reason why she had medical records in the real-estate case was because she wanted her PG&E files together.


   It turns out that, PG&E also sends in doctors to check on the family because of the risk of “chromium”, and that the company also wants to buy their home. This leads Erin suspicious and starts to find evidence that the water that the Hinkley residents was using was in fact contaminated by chromium-6, which can badly damage the human body. PG&E was lying to the residents of Hinkley, and Erin wanted justice for this. Erin convinced Ed to help with the problem so they could take PG&E down. This lawsuit proved to be difficult for Erin, Ed, and the Jensen’s until they all decided to convince the whole town that PG&E was the bad guy in this situation and that they lied to them. All, if not most of the residents signed in, to take PG&E down. Taking a break from here career to focus on her family life, Erin met a man named Charles Embry. He and his cousin were employees at PG&E and his cousin died from poison and was recruited to destroy documents about the incidents and any involvement of chromium-6 contaminating the water.


This significantly helped with the case and once and for all they took down PG&E for knowing that chromium-6 was infecting Hinkley’s waters and that they were trying to hide any evidence of it. PG&E had to pay a total of $333 million divided unto the residents of Hinkley. Erin Brockovich became a very successful woman, not for her skills, but for her morals knowing what’s right for everyone her hard work for justice.    

Thursday 13 October 2016

Chapter 3: Big Business and Ethics

Romulo Partoriza                                                                                          October 13, 2016

Pinnacle Pharmaceutical Inc. International Distribution Case


Discussion Questions

1. What are the reasonable limits on loyalty to one's employer?

As an employee, you should always be loyal to your employer unless you really think it is necessary. When it comes to a situation that your are uncomfortable with or think is wrong, being loyal to your employer is its reasonable limit. You don't always have to be loyal to your employer when you think something is absolutely wrong.    

2. Would Melanie's concerns have been better received if she had more scientific expertise?

If Melanie had more scientific expertise than her concerns would still be the same. Even if she knew more about the drug, the company wouldn't care in the world because Pinnacle knew that the drug would only be sold in Zaire and would help their AIDS epidemic, and would give them and edge to larger companies. As long as the company can sell the drug to Zaire and is approved by them then they won't stop selling the drugs.

3. Does a company have the right to sell their product internationally if it does not meet the safety requirements of the country they operate in?

No, a company does not have the right to sell their product internationally if it does not meet the safety requirements of the country they operate in. This is because the product was not approved in the country where they operate so they are not allowed to send their products anywhere else. If it wasn't approved in the first place then why sell it somewhere else? It would be illegal and be very dangerous. 

4. Should safety requirements be expanded to an international scale or are national standards sufficient?

Safety requirements should be expanded to an international scale so it would decrease the risk of companies selling non-approved products to different countries. All of the products have to meet the main safety requirement to even be sold anywhere. This further approves the safety of the product. 


Case Analysis Criteria

Pinnacle's Point of View Analysis: Pinnacle has decided to sell their non-approved CDA AIDS medication to Zaire, Africa. They went through the registration requirements and passed so that they were comfortable selling the drug to the people of Zaire. Pinnacle were confident with their decision and knew that it would help with the AIDS epidemic. 

In Pinnacle's point of view, they seem to be doing the right thing. When the company was created they spend most of their time and resources to create a medication to help with AIDS. So an opportunity like this was what they needed to sell the drug. They knew they couldn't sell it in Canada because of the CDA, so they sold it to the people of Zaire. This helped their business but kept this a secret from the public. After all, this is what Pinnacle wanted in the first place. But this came at a high risk for the company. The drug was never approved by the CDA (so it could've been dangerous for a reason), let alone should be sold to another country. What they were doing was absurdly wrong and illegal. No one really knew how safe the drug was for the people of Zaire and if it should be even sold at all. Pinnacle was doing the "right thing" for the people of Zaire but was too careless and full of pride.